In a landmark decision that brings partial closure to one of modern history’s darkest chapters, the International Criminal Court has convicted former Janjaweed militia commander Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-al-Rahman of orchestrating widespread atrocities in Sudan’s Darfur region.

The verdict, delivered by Presiding Judge Joanna Korner, found Abd-al-Rahman guilty on all 27 counts related to war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the height of the Darfur conflict in the early 2000s. This marks the first successful prosecution of a Darfur war crimes suspect by the international tribunal.

Evidence presented during the trial revealed a systematic campaign of violence against Darfur’s civilian population, carried out under Abd-al-Rahman’s direct command. Witness testimony described horrific scenes of mass executions, where the defendant personally supervised the killing of approximately 50 civilians after having them transported by truck and beaten with axes.

“The accused was not merely issuing orders from afar,” Judge Korner stated in her ruling. “He maintained a physical presence during these atrocities and actively participated in the violence.” The court dismissed Abd-al-Rahman’s claims of mistaken identity, firmly establishing that he was indeed the notorious commander known as “Ali Kushayb.”

The Darfur conflict erupted when non-Arab tribes, facing systematic discrimination, mounted an armed rebellion against Sudan’s Arab-dominated government. Khartoum’s response was to unleash the Janjaweed militia, recruited primarily from local nomadic tribes, resulting in what the United Nations has classified as one of the century’s worst humanitarian catastrophes. An estimated 300,000 people were killed, with 2.5 million others forced from their homes.

Abd-al-Rahman’s eventual arrest came in 2020 when he fled to the Central African Republic following the new Sudanese government’s pledge to cooperate with international investigators. Though he claimed to have surrendered voluntarily out of fear for his life, evidence suggested a calculated attempt to evade justice.

The conviction sends a powerful message about accountability for mass atrocities, even decades after their commission. While the court has yet to announce sentencing, the verdict represents a significant step toward justice for Darfur’s victims and their families.

The successful prosecution also demonstrates the international community’s commitment to pursuing justice for war crimes, regardless of time passed or political obstacles. As Darfur continues to face ongoing challenges and periodic violence, this verdict serves as both a warning to potential perpetrators and a promise to victims that justice, though delayed, remains attainable.

The court will determine Abd-al-Rahman’s sentence in subsequent proceedings, where he faces the possibility of life imprisonment for his role in one of Africa’s most devastating conflicts.