The United States Treasury Department removed Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes from its sanctions list on Friday, marking a significant shift in relations between Washington and Brasília after months of diplomatic tension.
The decision, which also removed de Moraes’ wife and the Lex Institute she directs from the sanctions roster, followed a weekend telephone conversation between President Trump and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Documents from the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control confirmed the removal.
The Trump administration had imposed sanctions on Justice de Moraes in July, citing concerns over what it characterized as the misuse of judicial authority to authorize arbitrary pretrial detentions and suppress freedom of expression within Brazil. The sanctions represented an extraordinary step in American foreign policy, targeting a sitting member of a major ally’s highest court.
The controversy surrounding de Moraes extends beyond the charges that prompted the sanctions. In August 2024, the justice ordered the suspension of Elon Musk’s social media platform X throughout Brazil, alleging the company had failed to adequately address misinformation on its service. That ban remained in effect for two months before being lifted. The timing proved particularly notable given Musk’s prominent role as a major financial supporter of Trump’s presidential campaign during that period.
A senior administration official, speaking under condition of anonymity to discuss foreign policy considerations, indicated that the sanctions removal followed Brazil’s lower house passage of an important amnesty bill. The administration views this legislative action as evidence of improving conditions regarding what it terms “lawfare” in Brazil, a reference to the perceived politicization of legal proceedings against opposition figures.
The sanctions had centered on the judicial proceedings against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a conservative leader who maintained close ties with American right-leaning political circles during his tenure. Justice de Moraes played a leading role in overseeing those legal proceedings, which Bolsonaro’s supporters have consistently characterized as politically motivated persecution.
This development represents a measured thawing in what had become an increasingly strained relationship between the two largest democracies in the Western Hemisphere. The diplomatic friction had threatened to complicate cooperation on matters ranging from trade to regional security concerns in Latin America.
The Brazilian government responded to the announcement with evident satisfaction, viewing the reversal as a vindication of its judicial system and a restoration of appropriate diplomatic protocols between sovereign nations.
The episode raises broader questions about the appropriate boundaries of American foreign policy when addressing concerns about judicial independence and civil liberties in allied nations. The willingness to impose and then remove such sanctions within a relatively brief timeframe suggests the administration is calibrating its approach as circumstances evolve on the ground.
For now, both governments appear committed to moving past this contentious chapter. Whether this signals a lasting improvement in bilateral relations or merely a temporary pause in ongoing tensions remains to be seen as Brazil’s political and legal landscape continues to develop.
Related: Twelve Million Displaced Sudanese Face Catastrophe as World Focuses Elsewhere