Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has issued a stark warning to proponents of climate policy: deliver concrete economic benefits to ordinary citizens, or risk losing public support entirely.

Speaking at the Melbourne launch of a new book on energy policy, Rudd characterized the Trump administration’s cuts to green industry support as “unfortunate” but emphasized that climate initiatives would ultimately succeed or fail based on their ability to improve daily life for working families.

“Policy continuity will be supported if we continue not just good messaging about this, but actually deliver price outcomes, security of supply, electricity supply outcomes, new industries and new jobs, which people touch, see, feel, hear and have in their daily experience,” Rudd stated. “Otherwise, they conclude it’s all bullshit and therefore it doesn’t work.”

The remarks represent some of Rudd’s first public comments since completing his tenure as Australia’s ambassador to the United States. Now leading the New York-based Asia Society think tank, the former prime minister argued that Australia possesses significant advantages in developing green industries, citing the nation’s abundant land, solar resources, and proximity to Southeast Asian export markets.

Rudd pointed to current instability in Iran and the Strait of Hormuz as evidence that continued dependence on hydrocarbon fuels creates vulnerability for working people worldwide. He noted that drivers of electric or hybrid vehicles face considerably less exposure to geopolitical disruptions affecting oil supplies from the Persian Gulf.

The former Labor leader praised the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act as an example of successfully balancing multiple objectives: building future green industries, delivering affordable energy to American families, and creating employment opportunities. According to Rudd, the Biden team designed the legislation specifically to appeal to working families in politically conservative states, thereby creating constituencies with vested interests in maintaining green energy programs even after potential changes in political leadership.

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, also speaking at the event, reinforced the economic case for renewable energy in Australia. “We’re in a position now where we can say to the people, you can have cheaper power, affordable power, reliable power with renewables. And that’s why nobody is building new coal power stations in Australia,” Turnbull observed.

The former Liberal Party leader also criticized his party’s recent decision to preference One Nation in the Farrer by-election, describing the move as “retrograde” and noting One Nation’s position on climate change denial.

Rudd’s comments arrive at a moment of heightened global energy market volatility and ongoing debate within Australia about the pace and direction of energy transition policies. His emphasis on tangible economic outcomes rather than aspirational messaging reflects a pragmatic assessment of political realities facing climate policy advocates.

The remarks suggest that even supporters of aggressive climate action recognize the imperative of demonstrating clear benefits to skeptical constituencies. Without reliable electricity supply, lower energy costs, and genuine employment opportunities in emerging industries, public patience with energy transition policies may prove limited regardless of their environmental merits.

For Australia, with its substantial natural advantages in solar and wind resources, the challenge lies in converting theoretical potential into practical economic gains that resonate with ordinary citizens facing cost-of-living pressures.

Related: Mali Faces Largest Coordinated Attack in Years as Militants Target Capital