A taxpayer-funded news organization has begun liquidating substantial broadcasting equipment through public auction, selling items worth thousands of dollars for mere cents while citing funding disruptions during the recent government shutdown.
Radio Free Asia, which receives approximately $60 million annually from American taxpayers to produce news content across Asia, suspended operations after what it characterized as a lapse in funding. While the organization’s website went dark, the agency quietly commenced selling major portions of its broadcast infrastructure through Rasmus Auctions, a public auction platform.
The sales catalog reveals the scope of the liquidation. High-definition cameras carry starting bids of ten cents. Professional teleprompters are listed at forty cents. Broadcast lenses that typically command thousands of dollars in the commercial market are being offered for under one dollar. Even office equipment, including refrigerators, appeared on the auction block for twenty cents.
In total, more than one thousand pieces of equipment have been made available for sale, a move that has generated significant concern among congressional leaders who had been working to restore the organization’s funding.
Representative Darrell Issa of California, who had advocated for Radio Free Asia’s continued operations, expressed sharp criticism of the liquidation effort. The congressman characterized the sales as a betrayal of the American taxpayer, noting the unprecedented nature of such actions by an organization entirely dependent on federal appropriations.
“I’ve never seen such belligerence by an organization that gets a hundred percent of its money from the U.S. government,” Issa stated. “Lenses you’d pay thousands of dollars for are being sold for pennies. It’s clear they’re liquidating assets out of spite.”
The situation represents another chapter in the ongoing debate over federally funded media operations. Radio Free Asia operates as part of a broader network of government-supported international broadcasting services, originally established during the Cold War to provide news and information to regions where press freedom remains restricted.
When contacted regarding the equipment sales, Radio Free Asia representatives attributed the liquidation to budget cuts implemented by the Trump administration and the financial pressures created by the government shutdown. The organization indicated that the funding disruption forced difficult financial decisions.
The controversy arrives as broader questions emerge about the future of government-funded media operations. The incident has renewed discussions about oversight mechanisms for organizations that receive full taxpayer support, particularly regarding asset management during periods of budgetary uncertainty.
The fire sale pricing has raised additional questions about whether the liquidation represents sound fiscal management or a politically motivated response to funding disputes. Critics argue that selling equipment at such substantial losses damages the long-term interests of taxpayers who originally funded these purchases.
The matter now rests with congressional oversight committees, which must determine whether the asset sales violated any provisions governing the management of government property and whether additional safeguards are necessary to prevent similar situations in the future.
Related: White House Pursues Bilateral Concessions in New Russia-Ukraine Peace Initiative
